California Kaiser Medical Malpractice Lawyer
Kaiser Medical Malpractice Attorney Kaiser Permanente Malpractice Law Firm News Articles Testimonials Common Questions Español Visit our Blog Contact Us Click Here to visit an easy to print page
Video Vault
Information Center
Kaiser Malpractice
Bilirubin
Birth Injuries
Brain Cooling
Brain Injuries
Cancer Misdiagnosis
Failure to Diagnose
Kaiser Arbitration
Kernicterus
Medical Malpractice
Medication Errors
Pitocin
Premature Delivery
Surgical Malpractice
Wrongful Death
Contact us
Need answers fast, but can't call right now? Fill out the quick response form below and we will contact you shortly:
The Best Lawyers in America

Phillips v. Kaiser

Dr. Fagel negotiated a settlement of $3,500,000 on the behalf of a child who suffered severe hypoxic brain damage after his mother’s uterus ruptured during labor. At 41 3/7 weeks gestation, the mother, who was a VBAC patient (vaginal birth after Cesarean), was seen in the defendant’s clinic for a non-stress test. The test was interpreted as non-reactive, so she was admitted to the defendant labor and delivery unit for induction of a labor. However, the L&D obstetrician was never told that she was a VBAC patient and the clinic’s records were never sent to the L&D unit. At 1:39 p.m., Misoprostil was inserted to soften the cervix as part of induction of labor. At 8:43 p.m., the mother signed a VBAC consent form and Pitocin was then started at 3:02 a.m. At 2:54 p.m., the mother was fully dilated and began to push. At 3:53 p.m., the fetal monitor showed a sharp decrease in fetal heart rate and the mother was moved to the operating room at 4:05. The minor plaintiff was eventually delivered by Cesarean section at 4:20 p.m. with dangerously low Apgar scores. As a result of prolonged oxygen deprivation, the minor plaintiff now suffers cerebral palsy and requires 24-hour LVN care.

Dr. Fagel contended that the defendant negligently used Misoprostil, which is contraindicated for a VBAC patient because it is associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture. The defendant was also negligent for failing to promptly recognize signs of a uterine rupture and unnecessarily delaying in the delivery of the plaintiff. The defense claimed that there was no causal connection between the Misoprostil and the uterine rupture, which occurred more than 24 hours after the Misoprostil was administered. In addition, the defense claimed that all care was within standard because delivery of the infant occurred within 30 minutes after fetal distress was first recognized. However, Dr. Fagel was ultimately able to show that the defendant’s negligent actions were a clear cause of the plaintiff’s permanent injuries.         

  
Information Center
Dr Bruce G. Fagel & Associates California Medical Malpractice Lawyers California Nursing Home Negligence Attorneys
California Cerebral Palsy Lawyer California Kaiser Malpractice Cases
California Birth Injury Cases Nevada Medical Malpractice Lawyers

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.